Debunking Liberal arguments on gun control

Have you ever stoped and took a second to think the liberal arguments on gun control through?, not only do they fall apart but they would be quite laughable if it wasn't for the very fact that it's a serious assault on our constitutional rights, let me point out some of the not just false hoods but chasms in they're arguments for one liberals will tell you Chicago has a hi number of gun murders because people will go across the line into Indiana and purchase guns where the laws are much more lax they will tell you the same about the District of Columbia that the problem stems from people going into Virginia where it is also much easier to purchase a firearm a pattern quickly takes shape states with very strict gun control laws has violent crime rates through the roof while states with very relaxed gun control laws have some of the very lowest violent crime rates in the entire nation in every case liberals with there mind numbing twisted reality that only makes sense deep down the rabbit hole or through the looking glass where rabbits sport pocket watches and wear top hats and you never dare look behind the curtain or risk the wrath of the almighty Oz, pardon the rant now where was I, liberals simply point there finger across state lines saying that's the problem, it would be like if a crack house popped up in your neighborhood when the police arrive the crackheads pointing there fingers at the well maintained property next door saying that's the problem take them, it's the same difference instead of liberals acknowledging there methods does not work they simply shift the blame, another point of nonsense is the Liberal attack on assault rifles you simply have to look at the FBI 5 year report from 2006 to 2010 to find the truth over that period Knives killed 9075 which averages 1815 a year, fists 4147 which averages 829 a year, hammers 3031 which averages 606 a year, then you finally at the bottom of the list come to rifles 1980 which averages 396 a year, but that's liberal make a mountain out of a molehill to put the numbers in perspective in 2007 440K died from tobacco use 82K from car accidents 30K from stabbings which is all more than all types of guns put together not to mention rifles that struggle to reach 400 deaths a year, and then there's perhaps the biggest fallacy of all that the United Kingdom's since banning firearms is safer, across the board the UK has the highest violent crime rates in every category highest in all of Europe home invasions have skyrocketed stabbings beatings slashings with every type of sharp or blunt instrument imaginable is through the roof hardly the picture of a gun free society they try to paint quite the contrary criminals across the pond know law abiding citizens have no way to defend themself or property and criminals take advantage of it in every way imaginable, in closing I would debunk one more fallacy Liberals tend to spread, that the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution never meant for the average citizen to own or bear military style firearms liberals will tell you that it meant for us to have ball and powder type muskets not assault rifles what the hell do they think the military carry back then the musket was a state of the art weapon of the day the Constitution meant for the citizens to be as well armed as the military then and now, and liberals will babble on about why do you need a assault rifle? For the very same reason it was put in the Constitution not for hunting or for sports but for We the People to defend ourselves from TYRANNY and that is not a antiquated concept it has slithered through history like hells reaper Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Chairman Mao, Fidel Castro, Saddam Hussein, the list goes on simply ask the people of Syria why we need assault weapons.