Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Equal rights for all REALLY?

Those fighting for same sex marriage say it's the same struggle they've had throughout our history they compare it to equal rights for blacks, equal rights for women to vote, the rights for interracial marriage, a woman's right to have a abortion the list goes on, but I would ask to what point and how far should it go on? The liberal progressive agenda is to move the Social ball forward at any cost regardless of the issue, I would beg the question is a more tolerant and accepting Society always a good thing and where does it lead? When our founding fathers laid out the frame work for the Constitution no 1 envisioned or even imagined same sex marriage or abortion, it's like the gun control arguments if we relinquish our rights for a few certain types of arms and then another and another soon we are a nation of butter knife holders then even that becomes too scary and then we're down to spoons! What I'm describing is called the slippery slope in the courtroom they call it precedents over 200 years of history has already shown us the ball is progressively moving forward and with every acceptance of more and more socially liberal behaviors I ask again where does it end? What was once unthinkable is now widely accepted it does not take a visionary to clearly see if same sex marriage is allowed and tolerated the next step could easily be polygamy beastieality and pedophilia and if that's not enough always equal rights for rapist and serial killers because in this progressive liberal world we seem to all be caught up in everyone must have equal rights The same way they indoctrinate our kids into believing everyone who participates in a sporting event deserves a medal regardless of how unprepared for the real world it makes them the progressive liberal way has no boundaries or rules as long as you have nothing in your hand that you could throw at the machine because you're right stops when it threatens they're progressive march forward!

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Rand Paul vs the whores of Babylon

With the nation in financial ruin and liberal strongholds like Detroit turning into little more than waste lands and crumbling buildings with more and more cities following suit, a downgraded credit rating for the nation, and out of control unemployment, after losing the last two elections to Progressive Socialist its little wonder that the Republican tent is a bit tattered and is being drug in 2 different directions there's the party establishment the Rhinos if you will, that seems to think the only way to beat the Liberals is to become their mirror image and on the other end you have a ragtag band of conservatives, constitutionalist, libertarians, Tea Party Patriot groups and those just fed up with the crap, the breaking point was finally reached when the Obama administration excuse for a attorney General Eric Holder could not answer the simple question can drones be used against American citizens on US soil the answers seem to allude mister Holder that was the final straw that was all Rand Paul could take he said I will speak in till I can no longer speak I will speak as long as it takes until the alarm is sounding coast to coast, and what was he talking about a old school style of politics called a filibuster he made sure that John Brennan would not be appointed as CIA director and who rose up to support Rand Paul in his endeavor none other than Texas senator Ted Cruz, even Senator Ron Wyden Democrat from Oregon said he believed that Rand Paul made several important points, most of the rest of the Senators seem content in their role as whores of Babylon, some might compare what Rand Paul done to David striking down Goliath I wouldn't go as far as to say he destroyed the Obama machine but rand Paul is 1 of the few brave enough to pick up a stone and throw at it, a word of warning to all other legislatures when you see a brave soul standing alone finding the Beast single handed stand with him don't be afraid to cast a stone if need be those who sit idly by go home for that is where we will send you, I believe Rand Paul has the inside track for 2016 for a couple different reasons for one his father Congressman Ron Paul of Texas build a political machine and pieced together those libertarians, constitutionalist and Tea Party Patriots along with a unheard of number of college students across this country and made a force to be reckoned with, that made the GOP have to break their own rules just to have a nominee, there is little doubt that Rand Paul can hold this coalition together, the second Rand Paul proved with this historic filibuster that he is a fighter and like The Beatles song I'll get by with a little help from my friends, he was able to pull it off successfully which made for a rare picture in Washington someone who we'll fight for the rights of all Americans, personally I think that Rand Paul will head the ticket with Ted Cruz as his running mate in 2016

The demonization of patriots by the main street Media!

I was greatly offended by a recent segment on CNN comparing the Tea Party and patriot groups to the KKK and Nazis, at what point did being a patriot and believing in the Constitution justified labeling one as a Nazi? I take issue with CNN on this at so many levels for one my father fought successfully against the fascist in World War 2 to make sure the Nazis would never succeed, secondly I like most in the Tea Party and patriot group are stud fast supporters of Israel and like our own homeland will defend her with our last breath, and third if we take issue with someone and have something to say it won't be mumbled through a sheet it will be loud and clear for all to hear, the liberal controlled Main Street Media would have you believe that any public decent against the president could only be based on race, it is unimaginable to them that any sane person could disagree with his policies, so the liberal media has a tactic of flashing sheets and hoods swastikas and KKK symbals to instantly put you in a box with hate groups if you dare stand up for the country and the constitution, it's a form of intimidation liberals use to silence Patriots, but by their own numbers it's not working CNN reported since Obama has took office Patriot groups have increased by 813 percent, that is proof that regardless of the liberal medias best efforts there is a growing movement in this country that will not be intimidated, so in closing I will take this time to warn Liberals the pendulum on the great clock of time has swung as far left as we will let it we will yank it back hard to the right from my lips to God's ears we will take back our country count on it!

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Debunking Liberal arguments on gun control

Have you ever stoped and took a second to think the liberal arguments on gun control through?, not only do they fall apart but they would be quite laughable if it wasn't for the very fact that it's a serious assault on our constitutional rights, let me point out some of the not just false hoods but chasms in they're arguments for one liberals will tell you Chicago has a hi number of gun murders because people will go across the line into Indiana and purchase guns where the laws are much more lax they will tell you the same about the District of Columbia that the problem stems from people going into Virginia where it is also much easier to purchase a firearm a pattern quickly takes shape states with very strict gun control laws has violent crime rates through the roof while states with very relaxed gun control laws have some of the very lowest violent crime rates in the entire nation in every case liberals with there mind numbing twisted reality that only makes sense deep down the rabbit hole or through the looking glass where rabbits sport pocket watches and wear top hats and you never dare look behind the curtain or risk the wrath of the almighty Oz, pardon the rant now where was I, liberals simply point there finger across state lines saying that's the problem, it would be like if a crack house popped up in your neighborhood when the police arrive the crackheads pointing there fingers at the well maintained property next door saying that's the problem take them, it's the same difference instead of liberals acknowledging there methods does not work they simply shift the blame, another point of nonsense is the Liberal attack on assault rifles you simply have to look at the FBI 5 year report from 2006 to 2010 to find the truth over that period Knives killed 9075 which averages 1815 a year, fists 4147 which averages 829 a year, hammers 3031 which averages 606 a year, then you finally at the bottom of the list come to rifles 1980 which averages 396 a year, but that's liberal make a mountain out of a molehill to put the numbers in perspective in 2007 440K died from tobacco use 82K from car accidents 30K from stabbings which is all more than all types of guns put together not to mention rifles that struggle to reach 400 deaths a year, and then there's perhaps the biggest fallacy of all that the United Kingdom's since banning firearms is safer, across the board the UK has the highest violent crime rates in every category highest in all of Europe home invasions have skyrocketed stabbings beatings slashings with every type of sharp or blunt instrument imaginable is through the roof hardly the picture of a gun free society they try to paint quite the contrary criminals across the pond know law abiding citizens have no way to defend themself or property and criminals take advantage of it in every way imaginable, in closing I would debunk one more fallacy Liberals tend to spread, that the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution never meant for the average citizen to own or bear military style firearms liberals will tell you that it meant for us to have ball and powder type muskets not assault rifles what the hell do they think the military carry back then the musket was a state of the art weapon of the day the Constitution meant for the citizens to be as well armed as the military then and now, and liberals will babble on about why do you need a assault rifle? For the very same reason it was put in the Constitution not for hunting or for sports but for We the People to defend ourselves from TYRANNY and that is not a antiquated concept it has slithered through history like hells reaper Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Chairman Mao, Fidel Castro, Saddam Hussein, the list goes on simply ask the people of Syria why we need assault weapons.